I’m Catholic. But don’t presume you know what that means about me, ok?
The hardest thing for me, about being a Catholic today, is that saying that I’m Catholic is like saying I’m an American. One size does not fit all.
I am beyond frustrated with the sex abuse crisis, just as I think it’s fair to say, all of us are. Yes, there are people who are sick with their denial but I would contend that even they are frustrated, even if it’s a grossly misguided frustration. Just as I am frustrated with politicians, I’m grossly frustrated with the politicians in the Catholic church. One of my least favorite, is a well known public figure from the archdiocese just to the north west of mine. I refuse to post his name or link back to his narcissistic blog. I won’t dare to drive traffic to his self-absorbed and, frankly, sick public postings that he’s made in the aftermath of calls to hold him accountable for his actions, and a slap on the wrist by his current “superior”. To hear him tell it, he is the victim. I already was not a big fan of his but now his name and image make my stomach turn even more. If you aren’t going to accept what piddly consequences have come your way, go away. Stop telling us how awesomely humble you are, maybe we might believe it if you showed it.
I can’t quite pigeonhole my politics – I currently cannot name a single politician who I support because none of them promote MY agenda. Here I sit in the middle, aligning with the fiscal right on many issues, but on the social left with some issues, emphatically for the separation of church and state, defending life on both sides of that issue, defending the dignity of all humans regardless of color, creed, gender or orientation. Sitting on my couch, I think they’re (mostly) all a bunch of liars and hypocrites, blind guides and blind fools. (I’m sorry. I also have some very good people in my life who are involved in politics. So just posting that makes me a hypocrite. I don’t know how they live in that system. It would drive me nuts.)
So. Back to the Church. Last weekend, I spent a spirit and faith-filled weekend with about 29,999 other Catholics in Anaheim, California. Let me tell you, you’d think that hey, a bunch of Catholics celebrating Mass together – six on Friday, six on Saturday, two on Sunday – Reconciliation centers overflowing with lines, prayer services and a prayer chapel open throughout the weekend, along with 184 speakers, many of whom are priests (bishops even,) or other religious (sisters, brothers, etc,) – you’d think that would be a cause for celebration throughout the church. You’d think that this would be a sign that the church is alive and thriving.
Yeah, no. There’s a bunch of Catholics who want the Archbishop of Los Angeles to shut it down. They don’t like the Congress – they think it’s too progressive, not conservative enough. Some of the speakers call for conversations with which they disagree.
Yeah.
Make no mistake, there are likewise conferences that make the more progressive Catholics cringe, but this conference, sponsored by the local Archdiocese, not some radical group, brings criticism. In fact, one thing I notice in the blogosphere is that basic common practices out here in the west coast, make many on the east coast itch under their collars (priestly, religious and lay.)
The thing that strikes me, having studied the catechism and a bit of both Canon Law and the Vatican II documents: It’s a big church. Any time I hear someone say that something is not “appropriate” I listen with an ear of skepticism. Most of the time, when someone says that something is “Against” the church teachings or policies or theologies, whathaveyou, well, chances are that either they are ill-informed, they missed a loop-hole (that Canon Law is full of loop-holes,) or another church teaching can be used to support the very same idea.
There’s a joke among us Catholics. Go ahead. Ask me why that is… “It’s a mystery.”
So, summing up the intro:
It’s a really big church. I’m so grateful that it’s a really big church. I sit side by side in mass with people who agree or disagree with me on many things. I know the one thing that (should) unite us all: The seven Capital S Sacraments, most especially the celebration of the Eucharist. Over the past several weeks since the Pope announced his retirement, I’ve read several essays in the media proclaiming this message: Don’t try to fit us all into one stereotype. It’s a really big church.
I came home from Congress rejuvenated and so validated in so many different ways. I heard awesome speakers who validated the awesome ministry work I do as Baptism Coordinator in my parish. I heard my very favorite author, a Jesuit, who writes books on both prayer and about his faith journey. I met with publishers of my favorite prayer daily prayer resource, Give Us This Day.
Let me say, while I identify myself as a progressive Catholic, you can’t pigeonhole me there, either. Yes, I think we need to have a conversation about the priesthood. I waffle on my opinions and thoughts on celibacy. I believe, as do others less “progressive” than I am, I will see something drastic in my lifetime: Will it be an end to celibacy? An end to the all-male priesthood? A great schism in the Church? I don’t know. What is a bigger threat to the church hierarchy: Married priests or celibate women?
But conversation does not mean I’m advocating for “disobedience.” (Oh, I hate that word.) I don’t think it’s disobeying anything to say “We need to talk about this and consider this, consider the impact of not making changes.”
And just because I consider myself “progressive” does not mean I ignore the fundamentals of the Faith. What it comes down to for me, is that over thousands of years, a lot of the stuff on the outside has changed, the fundamentals of the faith remain.
My point… I do have one… Where did this come from?
Watching the coverage of Pope Benedict’s final day as the Pontiff is driving me a little bit nuts. I’m tired of anchors and reporters speaking about topics without doing their homework or without really paying attention.
This morning a local reporter commented that He Who I Refuse To Name is a “Cardinal Emeritus” because the region has a new Cardinal. No. He is the Archbishop Emeritus. The region does not have a new Cardinal. Cardinal is not an office, it’s an honorary title. The Cardinal is still a Cardinal, and he’s still young enough to be in Rome voting for the new Pontiff. Thanks for playing, but the new head of the local church is “just” an Archbishop.
A few minutes later, the co-anchor back in the studio commented on speculation that the Pope is stepping down because he’s so upset about the scandals in the Church.
No. He’s not. Let’s back up, because apparently y’all either have short term memories or just don’t pay attention to these things like I do…
I’m not the least bit surprised that the Pope retired. Nope. I’m not. He caught me off guard retiring NOW but surprised? No. Years ago, when the college of cardinals elected him, the then new Pope said he would step down when his health prevented him from performing the tasks of Pope properly. Not if, but when.
I think this is the ultimate legacy of Benedict. So many people had expectations of this Pope. Many hoped, and many dreaded, he would bring the church to more orthodoxy. Many regretted he did not do more in this regard, many thought he did a great job, many will disagree with both opinions.
But with everything in me, I think this is what Benedict set out to do when he became Pope. He saw his predecessor’s health slide. While I have no idea what happened behind the Vatican walls, I have to wonder what happened during that time? Did the scandals plaguing the church today suffer when the Pope’s health prevented him from being fully attentive to the needs of the very large church?
This morning, my middle son said he wished that the Pope just kept the job until he died because it would make the transition easier. “They wouldn’t have to figure out what to do since the Pope is still alive! They already know what to do when the Pope dies but since he’s alive, they have to figure out what to do now.”
I sort of giggled but then I did something I’ve rarely done, I defended and affirmed Benedict: That, my son, is EXACTLY why he did this. Now, NOW we have a guideline in place. Now we know what will happen when the Pope retires. And now, the next Pope will have a graceful example to follow. I’m frankly rather surprised that this isn’t more obvious to others in the media – or else it does not fit their agendas? Or their pigeonholes?
Oh yes, Joseph Ratzinger knew exactly what he was getting into when he said “Accepto.” And this may very well be the greatest gift he could’ve given the church. A legacy to bravely take us into the future, no matter what that future looks like.